Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शन
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1990.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
The bhasya (commentary) of Sri Vallabhāācrya (V.) on the Brahma- sütras (B.S.) of Bādarāyaṇa (A.B.). is known as Anu Bhāṣya (A. B.) Somehow it has received the same attention as it really deserves at the hands of Vedäntists. To substantiate this thesis it is proposed to give here a critical review of the Dr. V.
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
एम. वी. जोशी वल्लभाचार्य के ब्रह्मसूत्र-भाष्य 'अणुभाष्य' की रक्षा वी. एस. घाटे की पुस्तक 'द वेदान्त' के विरुद्ध करते हैं, जिसने निम्बार्क को सर्वश्रेष्ठ कहा था। उनका तर्क है कि घाटे की विशुद्ध साहित्यिक तुलना दार्शनिक सूत्रों के साथ अन्याय करती है; विवादित अधिकरणों की वे पुनर्समीक्षा करते हैं। M. V. Joshi defends Vallabhacharya's Anubhashya on the Brahmasutras against V. S. Ghate's The Vedanta, which gave Nimbarka the palm. Ghate's avowedly literary comparison of the five bhashyas, he argues, misreads texts that are philosophical throughout, and he re-examines the disputed adhikaranas.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (4,767 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.