Being and Differance-Radhakrishnan and Derrida

Sarvapelli Gopal has shown what Radhakrishnan was doing in his work, Indian Philosophy :- "He reconstructed the arguments of the ancient texts and assessed them in relation both to the debates which formed their original context and to modern controversies. The text is the point of mediation between two minds and the interpretation must not

Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.

बक्षी राधाकृष्णन के प्राचीन ग्रंथों के पुनर्निर्माणात्मक पाठ को देरिदा के विखंडन के सामने रखते हैं। राधाकृष्णन में उन्हें वही उपस्थिति-मूलक शब्दकेंद्रित अधिभूतवाद दिखता है जिसे 'दिफरांस', 'ट्रेस' और 'मिटाकर लिखना' तोड़ते हैं; आत्मा की सत्ता बनाम केवल संकेतक कर्ता का भेद भी वे स्पष्ट करते हैं। Baxi sets Radhakrishnan's reconstructive reading of ancient texts beside Derrida's deconstruction of Western philosophy. He finds in Radhakrishnan the logocentric metaphysics of presence that differance, trace, archewriting and writing under erasure are meant to undo, and contrasts the realised self with the merely signifying subject.

Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.