Archaeologyपुरातत्त्वVol. 3, Issue 2-3
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Historyइतिहास
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1972.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
There are many mooted problems which Indian history has had through Its course of time Many of these problems have fetched and are fetching the scholars, from time to time, into the battle of arguments and counter- arguements Sometimes the new findings or discoveries, such as dated epigraphical records, coins etc, offer historians to change
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
जमींदार शक संवत् के प्रवर्तक के रूप में सुझाए गए शासकों— वोनोनीस, कनिष्क, नहपान आदि— की समीक्षा करते हैं, प्रत्येक तर्क की सीमाएँ दिखाते हैं, और तिथियुक्त अभिलेखों तथा सिक्कों के आधार पर पश्चिम भारत के कार्दमक शासक चष्टन के पक्ष में प्रमाण जुटाते हैं। Jamindar reviews the rulers proposed as founder of the Saka era, among them Vonones, Kaniska and Nahapana, shows the limits of each argument, and makes a case from the dated inscriptions and the coins for the Kardamaka ruler Castana of western India.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (2,206 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
Archaeologyपुरातत्त्वVol. 3, Issue 2-3
Archaeologyपुरातत्त्वVol. 3, Issue 4