Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शनVol. 16, Issue 1
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शन
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1989.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
"Knowledge of Brahman is called Upanisad because in the case of those who devote themselves to it, the bonds of conception, birth, decay ctc., become unloosed, or because it destroys them altogether, or because it leads the pupil very near to Brahman, or because therein the highest God is seated." (Śamkara) The Upanisads that record
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
बेटाई राधाकृष्णन की उपनिषद्-व्याख्या का अनुसरण करते हैं: भिन्न-भिन्न काल के, भिन्न अनुभूति वाले ऋषियों की वाणी होने से उनसे कोई एक सुसंगत दर्शन नहीं निकलता, फिर भी उद्देश्य की एकता है। प्रत्येक सम्प्रदाय ने उनमें अपना ही मत पढ़ा; राधाकृष्णन शंकर की व्याख्या को सर्वाधिक प्रातिनिधिक मानते हैं। Betai follows Radhakrishnan's reading of the Upanisads: set down at different times by seers of differing insight, they yield no single system, yet keep a unity of purpose. Every later school has read its own doctrine into them, and Radhakrishnan takes Sankara's as the most representative.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (6,769 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शनVol. 16, Issue 1