HistoryइतिहासVol. 19, Issue 1
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Jain Logic & Epistemologyजैन न्याय एवं तर्कशास्त्र
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1989.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Jayanta first presents the Buddhist's case on the question of perception and then refutes it. On the Buddhist's showing perception is that type of cognition which is devoid of all thought and is non-illusory; Jayanta finds fault with both these elements of the definition but his discussion is largely concerned with the first. Kalpana (vikalpa)
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
शाह जयंत भट्ट की 'न्यायमंजरी' के उस प्रसंग का अनुसरण करते हैं जिसमें वे बौद्धों की प्रत्यक्ष-परिभाषा का खंडन करते हैं कि प्रत्यक्ष निर्विकल्प और अभ्रांत ज्ञान है। जयंत पूछते हैं कि वर्तमान वस्तु को ग्रहण करने वाली कल्पना प्रमाण क्यों नहीं, और सविकल्पक प्रत्यक्ष की रक्षा करते हैं। Shah follows Jayanta Bhatta's refutation, in the Nyayamanjari, of the Buddhist definition of perception as cognition free of thought and non-illusory. He presses the Buddhist on why kalpana, which grasps a present object, is denied the standing of pramana, and defends determinate perception.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (6,081 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
HistoryइतिहासVol. 19, Issue 1
Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शनVol. 6, Issue 1-2
Scriptures & Canonआगम एवं शास्त्रVol. 6, Issue 1-2