Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरण
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1976.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
1 In my paper On the Galita pradipa of Lakṣmidharasuri', I referred to Madhava's Rgvedavyakhya and observed "It is noticed that Madhava has taken his cue from the presence and absence of a galia while interpreting many a Rgvedic passage but it is a matter of regret that later commenta- tors have not taken cognisance
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
जोग 'गलित' का अध्ययन आगे बढ़ाते हैं — ऋग्वेद की वे आवृत्त ऋचाएँ जिन्हें पदपाठ में संक्षिप्त कर दिया जाता है। प्रथम अध्याय के उदाहरणों से वे दिखाते हैं कि शाकल्य का लोप नियमबद्ध है, और माधव की व्याख्या ही उसका अर्थ खोलती है, जिसे परवर्ती टीकाकारों ने उपेक्षित छोड़ दिया। Jog continues his study of the galita, the repeated Rgvedic passage abridged in the Padapatha. Working through examples from the first adhyaya, he shows that Sakalya's omissions follow stated principles, and that Madhava's commentary alone reads sense into them where later commentators ignored the device.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (2,880 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.