Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Art, Architecture & Iconographyकला, वास्तु एवं प्रतिमाविज्ञान
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1996.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
In the classical tradition of Sanskrit drama, there is hardly any author who is unacquainted with the Natyaśāstra of Bharata. It is presumed that Bhāsa, being anterior, does not exhibit the influence of the tradition of NS, and the structure of the so-called Bhāsa-plays, as well as several motifs utilised therein violate Bharata's maxims. Bhāsa
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
त्रिपाठी देखते हैं कि संस्कृत नाटककारों ने भरत के नाट्यशास्त्र का कितना अनुसरण किया। भास के व्यायोग, समवकार और उत्सृष्टिकाङ्क उसकी परिभाषाओं पर पूरे नहीं उतरते; कालिदास ने उसका सौन्दर्यतत्त्व आत्मसात् किया; भवभूति और राजशेखर उससे हटे। अन्त में राजसभा, मन्दिर तथा खुले रंगमंच की तीन धाराएँ बताई हैं। Tripathi traces how far Sanskrit dramatists followed Bharata's Natyasastra. Bhasa's vyayoga, samavakara and utsrstikanka only loosely fit its definitions; Kalidasa absorbed its aesthetics and answered the santa-rasa debate; Bhavabhuti and Rajasekhara departed from it. He distinguishes three channels of growth: court, temple and open-air theatre.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (3,896 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.