Jain Literatureजैन साहित्यVol. 3, Issue 1
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरण
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1977.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Whether prepositions are invested with any meanings of their own or they merely indicate the meanings latent in the roots is an old controversy dating back to the pre-Yäska era. As unlike nouns and verbs prepositions are never used independently. They are presumed to have no function beyond bringing out the different shades of meanings
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
सत्यव्रत अश्वघोष के उपसर्ग-प्रयोग की जाँच वैयाकरणों के उस नियम के विरुद्ध करते हैं कि उपसर्ग धातु के अर्थ को सीमित, पुष्ट अथवा परिवर्तित करता है। वे दिखाते हैं कि अश्वघोष प्रायः परम्परा से हटकर, कहीं स्वेच्छा से तो कहीं निरर्थक रूप में उपसर्ग लगाते हैं। Satya Vrat examines the upasargas of Asvaghosa against the grammarians' rule that a preposition limits, strengthens or alters a root's sense. He shows that Asvaghosa often departs from the norm, using prepositions arbitrarily or pleonastically, and collects instances from the two poems.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (1,984 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
Jain Literatureजैन साहित्यVol. 3, Issue 1