Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Comparative Religion & Philosophyतुलनात्मक धर्म एवं दर्शन
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1989.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
0 REASON AND INTUITION IN DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN'S PHILOSOPHY Prof. C. V. Raval Introductory The critics of Indian Philosophy at home and abroad have lamented that "the creative period in Indian Philosophy" stopped at the close of the Hindu period in Indian history. They hold that the subsequent develop- ment in contemporary Indian philosophy has
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
रावल इस आरोप का खंडन करते हैं कि भारतीय दर्शन की सर्जनात्मकता समाप्त हो गई, और बुद्धि तथा अपरोक्ष अनुभूति के संबंध पर राधाकृष्णन का मत रखते हैं: अंतःप्रज्ञा तर्क का विरोध नहीं, पूर्ति करती है। जोड का वह कथन भी उद्धृत है कि वे पूर्व-पश्चिम के संपर्क-अधिकारी हैं। Raval rejects the charge that Indian philosophy lost its creative period, and expounds Radhakrishnan on intellect and intuition: intuition does not contradict reason but completes it. He quotes Joad's description of Radhakrishnan as a liaison officer between Eastern wisdom and Western knowledge, and appends a bibliography.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (3,959 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.