Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Jain Literatureजैन साहित्य
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1994.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Śrī Śankuka is one of those ācāryas whose views on rasa-realization have been quoted by Abhinavagupta while commenting on the rasasūtra of Bharata (Nāṭyaśāstra, ch. VI. rasādhāyah). Here we will attempt a reconsideration of Śrī Śankuka's views. Śrī Śankuka disagrees with Lollața and is not inclined to take rasa as an intensified mental state (upacitaḥ
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
नन्दी श्रीशङ्कुक के रसनिष्पत्ति-सिद्धान्त की पुनर्विवेचना करते हैं, जिसमें सामाजिक नट में अनुकृत भाव का अनुमान करता है; चित्रतुरग के दृष्टान्त से वह प्रतीति न सम्यक् है न मिथ्या। तौत तथा अभिनवगुप्त के आक्षेपों के विरुद्ध लेखक कहते हैं कि यहाँ अनुकृति और अनुमिति काव्यगत हैं, तार्किक नहीं। Nandi reconsiders Sri Sankuka's rasa-nispatti, in which the spectator infers an imitated mental state in the actor, a cognition neither true nor false, explained by the painted horse. Against Tauta's and Abhinavagupta's objections he argues that anukrti and anumiti here are poetic, not logical.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (923 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.