Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Reviewsसमीक्षा एवं साहित्य-परिचय
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1998.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Vol XXII, 1998 REVIEW 227 Nayaka was a sāmkhya philosopher Hemacandra, though a Jain does not become a 'pratyabhyña-vadın' because he follows Abhinavagupta's lead Similarly, Mahımā need not be a naıyāyıka simply because in the field of aesthetics he advocates 'kāvyānumiti' Again we do not choose to jump to the conclusion that Mahimā did not
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
वस्तुपाल-कालीन गुजरात की कविशिक्षा-कृति अमरचन्द्रयति की काव्यकल्पलतावृत्ति का संपादन डॉ. आर. एस. बेटाई ने परिमल स्वोपज्ञवृत्ति तथा शुभविजयगणि की मकरन्द टीका के साथ किया है। समीक्षिका तुलनात्मक टिप्पणियों की प्रशंसा करती हैं, पर हस्तप्रतियों का विवरण न देने और अलंकारचिन्तामणि की उपेक्षा पर आपत्ति उठाती हैं। R. S. Betai's edition (L. D. Series 117, 1997) of Amaracandrayati's Kavyakalpalatavrtti, a thirteenth-century Gujarat manual of kavisiksa in four pratanas, with the Parimala auto-commentary and Subhavijayagani's Makaranda. Mankad values the comparative notes but faults the missing account of manuscripts and the omitted Alankaracintamani.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (1,147 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.