Art, Architecture & Iconographyकला, वास्तु एवं प्रतिमाविज्ञानVol. 22, Issue 1
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Reviewsसमीक्षा एवं साहित्य-परिचय
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1996.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Vol. XX, 1996 Jhaveri by her friends and well-wishers. REVIEWS 211 As has been stated by the author, few scholars have utilized the Săṁkhya-yoga sources and the ideas contained in them to formulate a systematic Samkhya-Yoa theory of Pariņāma, and the Jain sources to formulate the Jain theory of Pariņāma, and the Jain sources to
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
कंसारा जागृति दिलीप शेठ के गुजराती शोधप्रबन्ध की समीक्षा करते हैं, जो पण्डित मालवणिया के निर्देशन में जैन, बौद्ध तथा सांख्य-योग में ज्ञान-दर्शन की तुलना करता है। पाँच अध्यायों का निष्कर्ष है कि दर्शन ज्ञान का ही ज्ञान है, इसीलिए जैन मनःपर्यायदर्शन नहीं मानते; श्रद्धा-अर्थ में भी दर्शन विवेचित है। Kansara reviews Jagrti Dilipa Setha's Gujarati thesis, written under Pandit Malvania, comparing jnana and darsana in Jainism, Buddhism and Samkhya-Yoga. Its five chapters argue that darsana is the knowing of knowledge itself, explain why Jainism admits no manahparyaya-darsana, and treat darsana as sraddha.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (1,003 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
Art, Architecture & Iconographyकला, वास्तु एवं प्रतिमाविज्ञानVol. 22, Issue 1
Memoirs & Traveloguesसंस्मरण एवं यात्रा-वृत्तVol. 22, Issue 1
Reviewsसमीक्षा एवं साहित्य-परिचयVol. 22, Issue 1