Review: Śrīmad-Bhāgavata-Mahāpurānam by N. J. Shastri

240 N M KANSARA SAMBODHI in restoring the flow of the narration They were all, as found, inserted at later dates when both of them were established as supreme godheads during the Puranic period When he found that some verses of First Adhyāya of the Bhagavadgītā are found repeated in the 47th Adhyāya of the

Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.

नडियाद के नवनीतप्रिय शास्त्री द्वारा सम्पादित श्रीमद्भागवत में वही पाठ दिया गया है जिसे वल्लभाचार्य ने अपनी सुबोधिनी टीका में स्वीकार किया था; संस्कृत भूमिका में शुद्धाद्वैत दृष्टि से अनुबन्धचतुष्टय की चर्चा है। समीक्षक इसे पाठ-समीक्षा की दृष्टि से उपयोगी मानते हैं, पर सात्वत-संहिता उपशीर्षक को भ्रामक बताते हैं। Navnitpriya Shastri's Nadiad edition of the Bhagavata Purana prints the text as Vallabhacarya read it in his Subodhini commentary, with a Sanskrit introduction on the anubandha-catustaya from a Suddhadvaita standpoint. Kansara values it as a record of Vallabha's readings but objects to the subtitle Satvata-Samhita, which names another work.

Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.