Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Historyइतिहास
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1976.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
Anyone seeking to evaluate the Western contribution to Jaina studies cannot but be struck by the degree to which work on Jainism has lagged behind that devoted to both Hinduism and Buddhism. The history of Wes- tern scholarship in Buddhism in particular is a long and colourful one, covering a period of more than one
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
जैनी पूछते हैं कि पश्चिमी विद्वत्ता में जैन अध्ययन बौद्ध-हिन्दू अध्ययन से पीछे क्यों रहा। हेमचन्द्र से आरम्भ साठ वर्षों के भाषाशास्त्रीय कार्य, सिद्धान्त के बदले प्राकृत में रुचि, सम्प्रदायों पर रेनू और स्टीवेन्सन के मत, तथा विद्वानों और जैन समाज के सम्पर्क के अभाव की वे समीक्षा करते हैं। Jaini asks why Western scholarship on Jainism has lagged so far behind the work on Buddhism and Hinduism. He reviews sixty years of philology from Hemacandra onward, the preference for Prakrit over doctrine, Renou and Mrs Stevenson on the sects, and the absence of contact between scholars and the community.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (5,221 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.