Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरण
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1976.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
AS ILLUSTRATED BY THE KARPÜRAMANJARI. G. H. Schokker 1 As is well-known, the Indian plays as a role are written both In Sanskrit, viz. the standard language of the North-Indian civilization, and In Prakrit which represents the Middle Indo-Aryan vernacular. The Prakrit of the drama has two main varieties, viz. Mahārāştri and Sauraseni¹. Here' We
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
शोक्कर का मत है कि संस्कृत नाटक में महाराष्ट्री और शौरसेनी का भेद भौगोलिक नहीं, साहित्यिक प्रयोजन का है। राजशेखर की कर्पूरमंजरी तथा नाट्यशास्त्र की भाषासूची से वे दिखाते हैं कि संवाद शौरसेनी में और गेय पद्य महाराष्ट्री में रहते हैं; भेद क्त्वान्त बनाम वर्तमान कृदन्त का है। Schokker argues that Maharastri and Sauraseni in Sanskrit drama mark literary function, not geography. Using Rajasekhara's Karpuramanjari and the dialect list of the Natyasastra he shows Sauraseni carrying dialogue and Maharastri the lyric, distinguished by absolutive against present participle, and indexes the sattaka's Prakrit forms.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (6,975 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.