Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरणVol. 4, Issue 3-4
Loading
Fetching from the archive…
Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरण
Signing in is free and opens the scans and the text.
Turn the pages of the original scan, as it was printed in संबोधि, 1972.
Signing in is free. The scans are for members, as the PDFs are.
We have our vast ancient classical dramatic literature in which various characters are required to speak either Sanskrit or Prakrit as prescribed by our ancient dramaturgists The proportion of Sanskrit and Prakrit varies with the theme of the play and the status of the characters Without taking into consideration the actual space occupied by the
Transcribed from the prepared edition. This is the beginning of the article, not a summary — open the PDF to read it in full.
चन्द्र चारुदत्त, मृच्छकटिक, मालविकाग्निमित्र, रत्नावली और प्रियदर्शिका में संस्कृत तथा प्राकृत में बोले गए ग्रन्थाग्रों की गणना करते हैं। अधिकांश नाटकों में आधे से अधिक भाग प्राकृत का है, अतः इन्हें 'संस्कृत नाटक' कहना भाषा की वास्तविक स्थिति और प्राकृत के स्वतन्त्र महत्त्व, दोनों के साथ अन्याय है। Chandra counts the granthagras actually spoken in Sanskrit and in Prakrit in the Carudatta, Mrcchakatika, Malavikagnimitra, Ratnavali and Priyadarsika. Prakrit holds more than half of most of them, so calling the classical plays Sanskrit dramas misrepresents both their language and the independent standing of Prakrit.
Written by the archive’s cataloguers, not by the author.
The full text
This text is not 100% accurate: it has been extracted from the scan with OCR. Please refer to the original PDF for the most authentic content.
The full text of this article (1,856 words) is available to signed-in members, as the scans are. Signing in is free.
Language & Grammarभाषा एवं व्याकरणVol. 4, Issue 3-4